Saturday, October 31, 2015
Mrs. Ciccia's Class Meets Their New Buddies
Les Julian Performed for Us
Students got to help play instruments, sing, and dance!!
Everyone loved his music!!
We had fun playing getting to know you games!
We were sad to say goodbye, but can't wait to write & visit with our buddies again!
News From Grade Two
"Whooose" writing skills are now displayed on the bulletin board outside the main office? It's SECOND GRADE!!
Friday, October 30, 2015
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Miss Claffey's Class Learn about Nature at the New Britain Youth Museum and get to Meet their Writing Buddies!!
At the New Britain Youth Museum, students learned about different animals, including snakes. They were able to touch the snake if they wanted to. Most of the students were very brave! They learned about the food chain as well.
Students loved being about to touch the chinchilla!
We went to a pond at Hungerford Park and collected samples of water to test.
Back at the museum, students placed water in their slides to look at under the microscope.
We even got to see some animals!
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
On Time, All Day, Every Day!
Please do your best to have your child at school in time to be in their classroom no later than 8:50 a.m.
We’ll be recognizing classrooms with “perfect attendance” at our upcoming SURFS Up Celebration. Thank you for your support of our attendance goal and your support in ensuring that your child is in school On Time, All Day, Every Day!
Music Video at Macdonough School
Steve filmed a Fire Safety Video at Macdonough School on October 25th and 26th. Children in kindergarten through third grade were invited to participate.
Look for the world premiere of the music video later this year!
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
And Now For Something Completely Different: History Department Hosts Skull Session

The leading theory now is that the skulls are likely those of Native Americans and someone may have decided that possessing the skulls was a bad idea, especially with the recent artifact possession indictments in southeastern Utah. Investigators believe that by sending them to a university, the person thought someone on campus would know what to do with them.
"No note at all. It had a return address of Augusta, Montana, with the name of "Jim Crow," and that was it," [the police spokesperson] said.
The name of Jim Crow initially raised some concern due to its history with segregation in the South. Detectives have not found anyone with that name in the Montana town and believe it was a made-up name, like John Doe.
Jim Crow, John Doe -- whatever. A little bit of research reveals that the Crow (Apsaalooke) Nation headquarters are also in Montana, slightly south of Billings: Augusta is a four hour drive from there.
The other important information is that, should your university, department, or local historical society be in possession of Native American artifacts or remains, this may also be in violation of federal law. NAGPRA, which demands the cataloguing and eventual repatriation of objects, many of which are sacred. Human remains have spiritual implications for the group in question and need to be properly interred, taken from indigenous people in the United States during the long colonization of the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Remains improperly retained, I am also told by a Native colleague, can cause you to become sick.
Monday, October 26, 2015
Department of Economics, Part II: Organize, Goddammit!
![]() |
Illustration credit. |
This is a follow up to Monday's post, "Department of Economics," which Historiann commented on today with a brilliant post of her own.
There is an outstanding comment thread to follow at both Tenured Radical and Historiann, much of which reveals that vast numbers of our colleagues in public education and small colleges have salaries frozen below, or well below, 70K. For those of you who say we need a union -- I am on record as saying "union, yes" as well: I would *happily* trade tenure for a union, any day, any time. But you know why we have no unions? Faculty do not believe in the collective, and they are so easily divided by self-interest, envy and shame. Our individualism, and our fear that if we organize we will lose the social respect that came with that PH.D., bites us in the ass every time. Hence, those of us who can cut our private little deals and leave most of our colleagues in the dust.
We are also a little starry-eyed about employers, and a profession, that doesn't treat us very well especially when we sacrifice for them and for students. Note the vast number of people in both comment threads who think I should be "happy" about an escalating work load and a shrinking salary, and their only reason is -- I currently make more $$ and have a lighter teaching load than they do. Listen carefully, for this I believe: if privileged people like me are starting to notice a shift in the compensation atmosphere, if relatively wealthy schools that have a lot invested in the "prestige" of a traditionally tenured faculty, a 2-2 load, and a bank-busting annual fee for students think they donlt have to pay us any more -- well, many of you who are at the mercy of state legislatures ain't seen nuthin' yet.
I also think this question of salary rips off the cover off the fairy tale what we are sold in graduate school (particularly by Ivy League and Big Public Uni mentors who, my friends, make 2-4x as much as I do, at an earlier stage in their career, and have annual tax-free accounts worth upwards of 6K for research and travel to conferences) that all of us, when we leave graduate school, are really playing on the same level field. We are not the same, not by any stretch of the imagination, and the folks at the top do not think any of us are the same as they are. We get sorted into the masses and the classes in the job market, we more or less stay where we are sorted, and it isn't because some people are deserving and some people are not. It's because of how we are paid and how hard we are forced to work for it. Have you noticed that we haven't heard a peep from any big-time RI people coming clean on what *they* make to lecture twice a week, manage a stable of TA's and teach a graduate class of 10? No, you have not. Now that doesn't mean they don't work hard: it just means that if you are looking for Nicholas Romanov, he doesn't live at Tenured Radical.
But let's get back to the nitty and the gritty. In what world is it too much to expect that a professional salary for someone in her fifties, who trained for eight years in graduate school and who has put in almost twenty years at her job, should exceed 107K? Take a look at the AAUP Annual Report On The Economic Status Of The Profession: for my category of school, I am very underpaid. That said, I think many of you are *vastly* underpaid, and I am truly shocked -- by that fact, and by the resignation to being underpaid that makes itself evident in the view that shrinking faculty salaries are an inevitable outcome of -- what? History? Shrinking education budgets because we divert so much money to fight wars and politicians do not have the stones to tax corporations?
The neoliberal economic policies that are killing education are a cynical political choice, not a natural and inevitable force. I find it staggering, for example, that we clearly have a generation of scholars (many of you) who may not be able to send their own children to college without taking out loans because tuition, even at public schools, keep rising exponentially but their own salaries don't even keep up with the cost of living over the long term. I find it staggering that college teaching may soon, except for a sliver of the population, be something that a person can only afford to do if s/he has inherited wealth or a spouse with a good income. I find it staggering that many of you who have worked so hard to get where you are could easily be bankrupted by a serious illness, because your benefits are probably as $hitty as your salaries. For this you went to school for 10-15 years? For this you took out loans? Aren't you angry at someone other than me?
The neoliberal economic policies that are killing education are a cynical political choice, not a natural and inevitable force. I find it staggering, for example, that we clearly have a generation of scholars (many of you) who may not be able to send their own children to college without taking out loans because tuition, even at public schools, keep rising exponentially but their own salaries don't even keep up with the cost of living over the long term. I find it staggering that college teaching may soon, except for a sliver of the population, be something that a person can only afford to do if s/he has inherited wealth or a spouse with a good income. I find it staggering that many of you who have worked so hard to get where you are could easily be bankrupted by a serious illness, because your benefits are probably as $hitty as your salaries. For this you went to school for 10-15 years? For this you took out loans? Aren't you angry at someone other than me?
I think the other organizing problem is this: because I am better off than many of you, your attitude is that I *should* be happy and I must be whinging because all my upper-class friends from college are coining it. We aren't going to get a thing done about any of this until some of you stand up and say, "I'm getting screwed! Royally screwed!" Don't buy the "I'm so lucky to be teaching," or "I'm from a working class background and I could be homeless or working in a factory for minimum wage, but by some miracle I don't understand I get to teach." You earned the right to teach; and with that, you earned the right to respect from your employers. Since when did teaching college become a lifetime job at a starter salary? And since when did the "privilege" of shaping young minds (gag) pay the mortgage?
Have I changed my tune on this, as Historiann points out? Two years after the initial economic crisis, as shrinking faculty salary pools, cutting back benefits and eliminating tenure-track lines has revealed itself as the long-term plan for education, you bet I have.
Wear Pink Day!
Staff at Macdonough showed their support for Breast Cancer Awareness by wearing pink today. It was the tenth annual "Wear Pink Day!"
Hey, Is This Going To Be On The Test? Confederates In The Classroom
![]() |
Cartoon by Walt Handelsman. |
Masoff's Wikipedia entry has one account of the three Internet sources Masoff used that it claims link back to this document generated by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a group which works hard to separate the rebellion from the stink of involuntary human servitude. One way to do that is to imply massive black support for states' rights (as opposed to the right of states to pass laws that enslaved people because of their race.) One wonders if it was these lines that Masoff cobbled into that one pithy sentence:
"There are at the present moment, many colored men in the Confederate Army doing duty...as real soldiers, having muskets on their shoulders and bullets in their pockets...." Frederick Douglas, former slave & abolitionist (Fall, 1861).
How many? Easily tens of thousands of blacks served the Confederacy as laborers, teamsters, cooks and even as soldiers. Some estimates indicate 25% of free blacks and 15% of slaves actively supported the South during the war.
Young historians: beware the ellipse. And honestly? If you didn't know who Frederick Douglass actually was, that first line is impenetrably confusing.
This was brought to the attention of the authorities in question by our colleague, Carol Sheriff of William and Mary, whose child was assigned the book. "Sheriff says blacks occasionally took up arms to defend their masters, but it was illegal to use blacks as soldiers in the Confederacy until toward the war's end. None of those companies saw action on the battlefront and most worked involuntarily as laborers." Note: Sheriff is not claiming that no black person did service that supported the Confederacy, only pointing out that thousands of enslaved people did not sign up to risk their lives with the goal of perpetuating slavery -- which is what Masoff's odd little factoid strongly implies.
Textbooks do make mistakes, and they can be corrected. And yet, an erroneous fact like this one would be field-changing were it true, and Masoff has to be criticized for not recognizing that and pursuing the question further. That the text also then slipped through nnumerous other hands before ending up in Virginia classrooms is a scandal.
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Pumpkin Time Graph
BOOOO!!!
Today the Kindergarten classes created a giant graph of pumpkins! Each student chose which pumpkin they wanted to decorate. They got to choose between sad, happy, funny, and scary. There were the least sad pumpkins and the most scary pumpkins. Scary wins!